Archives

Kalinangan Refereed Journal

Volume no. 27 | 2019/11
Issue no. 2


Title
SELF-PACED E-MODULE: A DEVELOPMENTAL INITIATIVE
Author
Acosta, Rommel M.; Castro, Bryan D.; Tenorio, Ma. Annabelle I., Ph.D.
Views: 722 Cited: 1
Downloads: 8
Click here to download
Abstract
The difference in level of proficiency and competency was believed to be a major reason why some students are left behind. Thus, it is deemed important that learning outcomes include not only the learners’ mastery of basic factual information, but also the organization, integration, and application of task-relevant knowledge to novel situations. In response, this study developed a self-paced instructional emodule guideline for the core courses of Bachelor of Arts in Communication, Bachelor Arts/Science in Psychology, Bachelor of Arts in Legal Management, Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Bachelor of Arts in Multimedia program. The instruments used were two sets of survey questionnaire distributed to 217 randomly selected participants composed of 32 faculty members and 185 students from the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Batangas. The faculty members were asked to answer the survey questionnaire on their level of knowledge and skills relative to e-learning components while the students were asked about their level of acceptance of and readiness for online education and instructional e-module. Descriptive and inferential statistical procedures including Weighted mean and t-test were employed to analyze and interpret the data that were gathered. The research revealed that the faculty members have sufficient knowledge and skills of IT components needed to design an e-module, but they still need continuous training to sustain it. On the other hand, the students fully accept the mode of E-learning.
Keywords
differentiated instruction, e-module, multimedia, self-paced learning, teaching strategies, University of Batangas
References
Anderson, R. (2002). Guest editorial: International studies on innovative uses of ICT in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18 (4): 381-388.

Autry A., & Berge Z. (2011). Digital natives and digital immigrants: Getting to know each other. Industrial and Commercial Training, 43 (7): 460 – 466.

Blazar, D. & Kraft, M. (2016). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educ Eval Policy Anal,39 (1): 146–170.10.

Casao, D., Magpantay, R., Pita, E., & Tordecilla, R. (2018). Gearing towards a technology-driven environment: A study on the effectiveness of faculty’s ICT utilization, In focus, 5: 96.

Chipman, S. F., Segal, J. W., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (2013). Thinking and Learning skills: Research and open questions. New York, NY: Routledge–Taylor and Francis Group. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/320jn0O, November 2018.

CMO 46 s 2012. Retrieved from ched.gov.ph, July, 2018. Cuevas, H. & Fiore, S. (2014). Cognitive load theory. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2KCFKUV, July 2018.

Dobrovolny, J. (2006). How adults learn from self-paced, technology-based corporate training: New focus for learners, new focus for designers. Distance Education, 27( 2):155-170.

Kolb, D. & Kolb, A (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4 (2), 193-212.

Lavin, A., Korte, L. & Davies, T. (2010). The impact of classroom technology on student behavior. Journal of Technology Research, 2(1): 1-13.

Lee, S., Barker, T., & Kumar, V. (2016). Effectiveness of a learner-directed model for e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (3): 221–233.

Lowerison, G., Sclater, J., Schmid, R. F., & Abrami, P. (2006). Student perceived effectiveness of computer technology use in postsecondary classrooms. Computer and Education, 47: 465-489.

Neto, J., Huang, W., & Melli, N. (2015).Online learning: Audio or text?. Education Tech Research Dev, 63:555–573.

Rizzuto, M. (2016). Design recommendations for self-paced online faculty development courses. Association For Educational Communications And Technology, 222-224.

Schleicher A. & Tang, Q., (2016) Education in Thailand, an OECDUNESCO perspective. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2xgI0sc. July 2018.

Sims, R. (2006). Beyond instructional design: Making learning design a reality. Journal of Learning Design, 1 (2 ):1-9.

Stoeva, Z. (2018). What are the benefits of e-learning for teachers. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2LZIhYU, September 2018.

STU Online (2018). Importance of educational measurement, assessment and evaluation. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2XcbwyA, August 2018.

Tondeur, J., Valcke, M., & Van Braak, J. (2008). A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: Teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 24.

Watson, I. (2013). Digital natives or digital tribes? Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(2): 104-112. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2013.010210.