ORAL VS CREATIVE PRESENTATION SKILLS OF COLLEGE STUDENTS: BASIS FOR INTERVENTION FOR BETTER EMPLOYABILITY |
Author |
Augusto C. Africa, Daisy A. Ilagan, Agnes Tadia, Angelica Fe Liwag, Jacqueline Ocampo |
Views: 548 |
|
Cited: 0 |
Downloads: 18 |
|
|
Click here to download
|
Abstract |
This research determined the balance between the use of technology and oral communication skills among college students as factors for employability. Respondents were sophomore students who had taken the Purposive Communication (PC) course. Questionnaire was used to gather data. For statistical analysis, weighted mean and standard deviation were employed. Findings revealed that students are comfortable with technology as they see themselves in the virtual world. They can further share informative, expository, argumentative, and narrative texts to a moderate extent. Also to the same extent are the problems that students commonly encounter during oral presentation. Such include committing mistakes while presenting, feeling anxious and nervous, experiencing mental block, panicking, and worrying over grades and possible negative feedback. The results also showed that students can relatively answer questions within the knowledge, comprehension, application, and evaluation level. They believe that oral competence is only important in their prospective career phases to a moderate extent. The PC teachers, on the other hand, perceive that students tend to be lacking in the areas of pronunciation, grammar, speech flow, vocabulary, listening, comprehension, and organizational skills. Consequently, a significant difference was found in terms of the perceptions of teachers and students in relation to the studied skills. |
Keywords |
career path, oral communication, oral presentation competence, Purposive Communication, technical skill, technology |
References |
Al-Bashir, M., Kabir, R.,& Rahman, I. et. al (2016). The Value and effectiveness of feedback in improving students’ learning and professionalizing teaching in higher education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7:1-4. https://bit.ly/2SXJAuc.
Bankowski, E. (2010). Developing skills for effective academic presentations in EAP. https://bit.ly/2lyJwmO.
Beal, G. (2016). 8 Key differences between Gen Z and Millennials. Hulfpost. https://bit.ly/2yHT46f.
Bodewig, Christian et. Al (2014). Job-specific skills to promote employability. https://bit.ly/3oHoEGS.
Dunn, M. (2013). Theory of knowledge. https://bit.ly/2Za0c6f.
Dutton, J. A. ( 2019, June). Oral presentation and powerpoint. https://bit.ly/2Ws4bcw.
Exfosys,,Inc (2010). Harmony – The Soul of Organization. https://bit.ly/3HuNZwp.
Haidara, Y. (2016). Psychological factor affecting English speaking
performance for the English Learners in Indonesia. Universal Journal of
Educational Research, 4 (7): 1501-1503. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040701.
Idrus, H. & Salleh, R.(2017). Perceived selfefficacy of Malaysian ESL
Engineering and Technology students on their speaking ability and
its pedagogical implications. https://bit.ly/3Cmg31r.
Juhana, J. (2012). Psychological factors that hinder students from speaking in English Class (A case study in a senior high school in South Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia). Journal of Education and Practice, 3: 1-11.
https://bit.ly/3cEyMcB.
Kelly, M. (2019). Enhancing teacher-student interaction. http://faculty.
academy art. teaching and curriculum.
Morey, S. & Mouratis, J. (2016). New Adobe study shows gen z students and teachers see creativity as key to success. https://bit.ly/2YZlC5U.
Schweiger, D.L.C. (2018). Reaching and retaining the next generation:
adapting to the expectations of Gen Z in the classroom. Information Systems of Education (ISEDJ) ISSN:1545-679.
Suarta, Made, et. al (2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvt-17.2017.58.
Sulak, S. & Firdevs, G. (2017). The effects of teaching informative text through processual model on reading comprehension skills. nternational
Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10 (2):1-7. DOI: 10.26822/iejee.2017236121.
Tartakovsky, M. (2018, October). Overcoming the fear of making mistakes. https://bit.ly/2zASuHb.
Usman, U. (2016). Assessing and analysing students' vocabulary understanding through 6 kinds of tasks. https://doi.org/10.2991/icemal-16.2016.57.
Williams, A. (2015). Soft skills perceived by students and employers as relevant employability skills. https://bit.ly/3KqKgkf |