Archives

Kalinangan Refereed Journal

Volume no. 25 | 2018/4
Issue no. 1


Title
MAKING SENSE OF HUGOT LINES: SPEECH ACT AND HUMOR ANALYSIS
Author
Santillana, Priscilla Mizpah P., Ph.D.; Delgado, Mary Grace V.; Reyes, Merecedita S.; Maranan, Anita C.
Views: 1087 Cited: 17
Downloads: 30
Click here to download
Abstract
This study aimed to interpret hugot lines by identifying the speech act and humor style employed by its speakers. The selected hugot lines were chosen by the researchers based on their ability to represent Filipino humor with the use of words, lines and phrases which are colloquial expressions. Coding was used to identify the speech act (directives, declarations, commissives, expressives, or assertives) and humor style (affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, or self-defeating) of hugot lines. Hugot were then interpreted based on the result of coding. Results revealed that hugot lines are used not just to entertain but also to benefit the speaker specifically in terms of concealing or avoiding issues or problems which have to be dealt with or as regards alleviating the gravity of the situation or predicament. The results of this study is significant in understanding the use of humor in communicative expressions with emphasis on discerning the motifs, intentions and motivations of speakers shown in hugot lines.
Keywords
speech act, humor, Filipino humor, hugot lines, communication
References
Alexander, A. L. (2008). Relationship resources for coping with unfulfilled standards in dating relationships: Commitment, satisfaction, and closeness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 25, 725-747.

Askildson, L. (2005). Effects of humour in the language classroom: Humour as a pedagogical tool in theory and practice. Arizona Working Papers in SLA., 12, 45-61.

Atak, H. & N. Tastan, N. (2012). Romantikİliskilerve Ask.PsikiyatrideGuncelYaklasımlar. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 4 (4), 520-546.

Austin, J. L. (2009). Söylemekveyapmak. (R. LeventAysever, Trans.). İstanbul: Metis.

Aydın, A. (2005). HemşirelikvemizahC.Ü. HemşirelikYüksekokuluDergisi 9 (1), 1-5.

Barutcu, K. F. & Aydin, L. (2012). The scale for emotional reactions following the breakup. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84 (9) July 2013, 786-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.647Get rights and content.

Cann, A., Stilwell, K. & Taku, A. (2010). Humor styles, positive personality and health. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 213-235.

Cann, C. & Matson, R. (2014). Sense of humor and social desirability: Understanding how humor styles are perceived. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 176-180.

Cook, A. (2012). Individual differences in attitudes towards love. California State University: Chico.

Craciun, B. (2014). Humor as a defense mechanism and working instrument of the cognitive-behavioral therapy. Romanian Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Hypnosis. 1(1).

Cruthirds, K & Romero, E. (2006). The use of humor in the workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives.

Derakhshan, K. (2016). Revitalizing language classes through humor. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232 (14), October 2016, 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.005.

Driesmans, K., Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2016). True love lasts forever: The influence of a popular teenage movie on Belgian girls’ romantic beliefs. Journal of Children and Media, 10(3), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.462.

Fehr, S. S. (2000). GrupTerapisineGiriş –GrupTerapistleriİçin RehberKitap. FatmaZengin (çev). İstanbul. 46, 2012, 1167-1170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.268.

Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Understanding Close Relationships. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, (Chapter 1).

Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, J. Gray, K. & Weir. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality. 37, 48-75.

McFarlane, D. (2010). Social communication in a technology-driven society: A philosophical exploration of factor-impacts and consequences. American Communication Journal. Winter 2010, 12.

Mohsen, M. (2012). The correlation between identity status and loving elements (intimacy, commitment, passion). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.

Morgan, H, & Shaver P. R. (1999), Attachment process and commitment to romantic relationships. Jeffrey M. Adams and Warren H.

Jones (Ed). Handbook of Interpersonal Commitment and Relationship Stability, New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenurn.

Öner, A. (2012). Yetişkinbireylerinanksiyetebozukluğunasahipolupolma masıilekullandıklarımizahtarzlarıarasındakiilişkininincelenmesi.(Yayımlanmamışyükseklisanstezi).ÇukurovaÜniversitesi, SosyalBilimlerEnstitüsü, Adana.

Penzo, I., Giannetti, E., Stefanile, C., &Sirigatti, S. (2011). Stiliumoristicie possibilirelazioni con ilbenesserepsicologico secondo unaversioneitalianadello Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ). Psicologiadella Salute, 2, 49-68.

Saffrey, C., & Ehrenberg, M. (2007).When thinking hurts: Attachment, rumination, and postrelationship adjustment. Personal Relationships. 14, 351-368.

Sayar, B. (2012). Üniversiteöğrencilerininmizahtarzlarıileumutsuz lukveboyuneğicidavranışlarınınincelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamışyükseklisanstezi).SakaryaÜniversitesi, EğitimBilimleriEnstitüsü, Sakarya.

Searle, J. R. (2000). Sözedimleri.(R. LeventAysever, Trans.). Ankara: AyraçYayınevi.

Suiyerkul, B. & Chakyroglu, R. (2014). Representation of the Concepts “Happiness & Unhappiness” in the Kazakh Proverbs and Sayings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 136 (9) July 2014, 29-132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.302.

Yip, J.A., & Martin, R. A. (2006). Sense of humor, emotional intelligence, and social competence. Journal of Research in Personality. 40, 1202-1208.

Zhao, J., Kong, F., & Wang, Y. (2012). Self-esteem and humor style as mediators of the effects of shyness on loneliness among Chinese college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 686-690.