Archives

DIYIP

Volume no. 2 | 2022/10
Issue no. 2


Title
AN ASSESSMENT ON THE EFFICIENCY LEVEL OF BIOINFORMATICS TOOLS IN LABORATORY PRACTICES
Author
Latifah Denisse B. Arcega Jhazlyn Gwen R. Ite Cyril Hope C. Jamet Rizalyn Marion C. Medrano
Views: 183 Cited: 0
Downloads: 1
Click here to download
Abstract
This study entitled "An Assessment on the Efficiency Level of Bioinformatics Tools in Laboratory Practices''. The study specifically aims to analyze the Efficiency Level of Bioinformatics Tools in Laboratory Practices, to determine if inculcating a bioinformatics system is useful and efficient in laboratory settings, and to further enhance the knowledge regarding this topic. The study is quantitative in its nature and employed the use of descriptive research design to collect and obtain all the necessary data needed for the study. Also, it used survey-questionnaire as its main gathering instrument to collect data significant to the present study. The researchers selected a total of 50 medical technologists and laboratory experts (25 medical technologists, and 25 laboratory experts) as respondents using a simple random sampling where each individual is chosen entirely by chance and each member of the population has an equal chance of being included in the sample. Moreover, researchers used frequency and percentage, weighted mean, ranking, composite mean, and t-test as the statistical tools to analyze and interpret the data. In addition, the researchers concluded that the hypothesis should be accepted, and thus, there are no significant differences between the efficiency level of the use of genetic profiling and the utilization of genetic testing. In the end, the researchers generate a prototype model plan for a modified CRISPR device to redevelop its exertion in the biomedical field with the usage of techniques propelled for bioinformatics applications. The prototype model plan, in particular, enables medical technology experts, lab enthusiasts, and scientists to change and rewrite the genetic code in practically any organism as it also incorporates the integration of biochemical and molecular techniques, improving and boosting the ability to seek cures, treatments and prevent diseases, as well as the usefulness of bioinformatics for basic and clinical genetic research.
Keywords
Coronavirus; Bioinformatics Tools; Genetic Profiling; Genetic Testing; Laboratory Practices
References
Abdurakhmonov, I. (2016). Bioinformatics: Basics, Development, and Future. DOI:10.5772/63817.https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/50934?fbclid=IwAR02NEbVVh5F6vdwlJTTgvGexv9EJyRE0zNEs7bub_x4kjIuV6VjBdm21YA

Ahmed, S., Zhou, Z., Zhou, J., & Chen, S. Q. (2016). Pharmacogenomics of DrugMetabolizing Enzymes and Transporters: Relevance to Precision Medicine. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, 14(5), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2016.03.008

Avinash, A., Lakshmi, J., Tejasvi, A., et.al. (2021). DNA Profiling in Forensic Science: A Review.DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728689. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352010284_DNA_Profiling_in_Forensic_Science_A_Review

Bagnall, R., PHD. (2018). Whole Genome Sequencing Improves Outcomes of Genetic Testing in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.https://www.jacc.org/doi/pdf/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.078?fbclid=IwAR2vPJM3ErH76V9kZytno2w2gjA9lAGQ2yuDFTLW7VmHY0IopRmlGJpkUDo

Bairova, T., Nemchinova, N. V. & Sambyalova, A. Y. (2021) . The Commercialization of Genetic Research: A Pilot Study. DOI: 10.29413/ABS.2021-6.2.23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352721085_The_Commercialization_of_Genetic_Research_A_Pilot_Study? fbclid=IwAR2I7S68cDQq4mlARHvv4o9KZdCMrSkTeVv7k5v4TeWInpbRTW_09Ozss5A

Baumgarten, N., Schmidt, F., Wegner, M., Hebel, M., Kaulich, M., & Schulz, M. H. (2021). Computational prediction of CRISPR-impaired non-coding regulatory regions. Biological Chemistry, 402(8), 973–982. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2020-0392

Cai, Y., Huang, T., & Yang, J. (2018). Applications of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology in Precision Medicine and Immunooncology. BioMed Research International, 2018, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1427978

Carter, B., et al.(2018). Standards and Guidelines for Validating Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics Pipelines: A Joint Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and the College of American Pathologists.Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 4-27.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157817303732

Chiu, C. Y. (2019). Clinical metagenomics. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41576-019-0113-7

Diaz, E. (2021). Challenges in Genetic Testing.DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.29926.04167.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348404443_Challenges_in_Genetic_Testing

Ferraro, S., Braga, F., & Panteghini, M. (2016). Laboratory medicine in the new healthcare environment. De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-0803/html

Guerrero, C. R. (2021). The Changing Role of the Medical Technologist. Academia Letters. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christine-Guerrero/publication/353834105_The_Changing_Role_of_the_Medical_Technologist/links/611e64040c2bfa282a5869bc/The-Changing-Role-of-the-Medical-Technologist.pdf

Guo, B., & Wu, B. (2018). Integrate multiple traits to detect novel trait–gene association using GWAS summary data with an adaptive test approach. Bioinformatics, 35(13), 2251–2257. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty961

Gwinn, M., Khabbaz, R., & MacCannel, D. (2017). Integrating Advanced Molecular Technologies into Public Health. Vol. 55, No. 3, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01967-16.

Haworth, A., Savage, H., & Lench, N. (2016). Diagnostic Genomics and Clinical Bioinformatics. Medical and Health Genomics, 37-50. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780124201965000046?via%3Dihub

Inyang, G.A., Ogban, F.U., Osang, F., & Udensi, O.U. (2019). Software packages on DNA sequence data analysis Efficacy of the algorithm(s) in analytical software packages on DNA sequence data analysis Ogban et al. Software packages on DNA sequence data analysis Establishing Variation in Distances (Pairwise), 12(1):P. 47 – 60. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352212140_Software_packages_on_DNA_sequence_data_analysis_Efficacy_of_the_algorithms_in_analytical_software_packages_on_DNA_sequence_data_analysis_Ogban_et_al_Software_packages_on_DNA_sequence_data_analysis_Est

Maljkovic Berry, I., Melendrez, M. C., Bishop-Lilly, K. A., Rutvisuttinunt, W., Pollett, S., Talundzic, E., Morton, L., & Jarman, R. G. (2019). Next-Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Methodologies for Infectious Disease Research and Public Health: Approaches, Applications, and Considerations for Development of Laboratory Capacity. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz286

Oliveri, S., Ferrari, F., Manfrinati, A., & Pravettoni, G. (2018). A Systematic Review of the Psychological Implications of Genetic Testing: A Comparative Analysis Among Cardiovascular, Neurodegenerative and Cancer Diseases. Frontiers in Genetics, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00624

Oulas, A., Minadakis, G., Zachariou, M., Sokratous, K., Bourdakou, M. M., & Spyrou, G. M. (2017). Systems Bioinformatics: increasing precision of computational diagnostics and therapeutics through network-based approaches. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 20(3), 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx151

Saeb, A. T. M. (2018). Current Bioinformatics resources in combating infectious diseases. Bioinformation, 14(01), 031–035. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630014031

Sahin, S. (2021). A Brief Study on Descriptive Research: | International Journal of Research and Analysis in Humanities. https://Iarj.in/Index.Php/Ijrah/Article/View/38.

Schlaberg, R., Chiu, C. Y., Miller, S., Procop, G. W., & Weinstock, G. (2017). Validation of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Tests for Universal Pathogen Detection. Allen Press. https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/141/6/776/129024/Validation-of-Metagenomic-Next-Generation

Zhang, S., Li, X., Wu, J., Coin, L., O’Brien, J., Hai, F., & Jiang, G. (2021). Molecular Methods for Pathogenic Bacteria Detection and Recent Advances in Wastewater Analysis. Water, 13(24), 3551. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243551 Zhou, G., Soufan, O., Ewald, J., Hancock, R. E. W., Basu, N., & Xia, J. (2019). NetworkAnalyst 3.0: a visual analytics platform for comprehensive gene expression profiling and meta-analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(W1), W234–W241. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332304545_NetworkAnalyst_30_A_visual_analytics_platform_for_comprehensive_gene_expression_profiling_and_meta-analysis

Zhu, Y., Ouyang, Z., Chen, W., Feng, R., Chen, D. Z., Cao, J., & Wu, J. (2021). TGSA: protein–protein association-based twin graph neural networks for drug response prediction with similarity augmentation. Bioinformatics, 38(2), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab650